Clarifying context and approach
I think providing context on previous proposals and what "国家排名分配名额" means, similar to UEFA country coefficients, is a good idea. The best approach might be to ask what the user wants—like summary, impact, or comparison—and then offer what I know up to the cutoff date. I want to avoid making unsupported claims. Concise questions and context are key here, using short bullet points while keeping it brief and not heavily formatted.Structuring the response
I want to start by asking if the user is looking for details. I could highlight key points like the three-tier structure, national ranking allocation similar to country coefficients, and various aspects like promotion/relegation and legal status with UEFA.

Next, I might analyze potential impacts on competitions and legal viability. Then, I should clarify what the user wants—be it a quick summary or a deep dive. Given their initial inquiry, I’ll aim to provide a concise summary and mention that details could evolve. I'll also ask them for a link to the article.Summarizing key points
I want to provide some quick takeaways, assuming the headline context means slots are allocated by country ranking while keeping the three-tier structure. This likely includes promotion/relegation and team caps per country to maintain competitive balance, as well as a focus on the season timetable and streaming options.
Next, I could highlight key differences with UEFA, like country allocations versus club coefficients, and the potential for either a closed or open system. I should consider what to watch next, such as club sign-ups and UEFA's response. Lastly, I’ll ask for the source link.
你是想看要点解读、和欧冠对比,还是影响评估?如果有原文链接我也能基于细节更精确梳理。先给你一个快读版:
需要我:
